As a true crime author it is impossible for me to walk past a magazine with Charles Manson on the cover. I’m weak that way. After all, one of the books that drew me into writing TC was Helter Skelter. Also, I just finished watching Waco on Paramount network, so I was compelled to pick this up.
Time-Life has put out of few of these magazines focused on true crime. Lavish in photos, they don’t go into much depth. If you are looking for shocking revelations or new information, generally these are not where you go. This issue, I have to admit, they did provide some new bit of information I was unaware of – hence my taking the time (pun intended) for a review.
Half of the 96 pages of this magazine are dedicated to Manson. There are some photos I have not seen before, plucked from Life’s archives no-doubt. When it comes to new information, there’s not a lot here, but there are some nuggets that were interesting – especially about Manson’s life behind bars.
The remainder of the article focused on the Jonestown massacre, the Branch Davidians, the Heaven’s Gate suicides, and the terror attacks of Aum Shinrikyo. There’s not a lot of depth here on these other groups, only the basic information. I have to admit, I knew almost nothing about, Aum Shinrikyo which made it most interesting chapter to me. It surprised me that this organization had such a strong following in Russia. You just don’t associate cults with Russia, at least I don’t.
I probably could just end the review right here and say it was three out of five starts. Mildly entertaining, but not a lot that is new. It was worth looking at for some of the photos. I can’t just let it go that easily. What this relatively simple magazine does is make you wonder and question, “what is a cult?”
Time-Life seems to concentrate on any group of people led by a charismatic leader; where the leader exerts control over these people to some extent. “Cult” is a word that has a negative connotation to it, but in this case it makes you wonder what Time-Life’s criteria was for inclusion. I understand the arguments for most of these cases, but in the case of the Branch Davidians I am wondering if they were truly a cult. I think David Koresh had a strong influence over his people, but from accounts I have read from the survivors, they also opted to stay with him on their own accord based on their beliefs.
Were the Branch Davidians simply a deeply devoted group of followers of a religious lifestyle, or were they a cult? I’m not sure I can make that call, but the fact is, this book helped me consider that question says quite a bit.
Overall this is a three out of five stars.