Headline News Network’s (HLN) Unmasking a Killer is two episodes in to a five part series on the Golden State Killer that terrorized California in the 1970’s and 80’s. There’s a lot of buzz around the Golden State Killer, new books (including Michelle McNamara’s I’ll Be Gone in the Dark), several new series, etc. I have to admit, I knew very little about these cases until the last year. As a true crime author you tend to be heads-down on certain cases and only have cursory knowledge of others. It’s a matter of maintaining focus. All this means is I cannot tell you how comprehensive this show’s coverage of the cases are.
I saw some of the Golden State Killer series on ID Discovery on these cases and wasn’t dazzled with their presentation or format. It wasn’t bad, it just didn’t seem to flow very well. Not so with HLN’s Unmaking a Killer. Two episodes in and I am hooked. To me, it is all about the packaging of a good true crime on TV. The HLN series talks to some of the victims, but really engages law enforcement who worked the cases. The reenactment elements are short visuals, not overboard like you see on some series. I like hearing from the people that worked the cases on my true crime TV, because they often offer details you haven’t heard before.
As someone who knew little about these crimes, Unmasking has done a great job of taking me on a journey as to how the East Area Rapist (EAR) and the Original Night Stalker (ONS) are actually one-in-the-same. The second episode takes you through the MO of the EAR – what were his signature actions, how he stalked his victims carefully, etc. In a visual checklist on the screen, you really get a sense as to how this horrific criminal meticulously worked. Unlike most criminals, the East Area Rapist would call some of his victims’ years after the crime, to continue to torment them. This is not your typical serial killer or rapist. This sick bastard is diabolical.
I got hooked. In fairness, it is hard for a true crime series to compel me to watch. This is one I make sure I follow. It is on Sunday nights and has disturbed two Sunday’s worth of sleep so far. Well done HLN! Combined with the Patty Hearst series on sister station CNN, it is clear that CNN/HLN are dipping their toes into the true crime market. Does this mean another true crime network is not far off? I tend not to think of HLN as a true crime channel, despite the series Forensic Files. We may have to rethink that now that they are putting out quality shows like Unmasking a Killer.
So far, this is what I call, reflective true crime…a retelling of the crimes and investigations. There’s no heady promise to unearth new evidence, not yet. This is opposed to the investigative true crime series, like the History Channel’s Zodiac, where the investigators are pursuing new leads and doing new(ish) investigative work.
I recommend you DVR or On-Demand watch this series! They even have a follow-on podcast after each episode. #truecrime
Waco is everywhere on TV…there are at least three documentary-style mini-series out there interviewing the survivors of the disastrous raid. The 25th anniversary generates that kind of true crime nostalgia. Just to be clear, I am reviewing the Paramount (formerly Spike) network docudrama called Waco.
It might be hard to remember the events accurately. In 1993 the ATF and FBI raided the Branch Davidian Compound in Waco, Texas. The Davidians were led by David Koresh and were often characterized at the time as being a cult and that Koresh was a madman. Of course, that is the government’s side of matters. The raid turned into a gun battle that ultimately resulted in the deaths of 76 of the Davidians. For those of us who remember the 51 day standoff, it was horrific on many levels, and seemed brutally unnecessary.
Ironically this mini-series comes out at a time when the integrity of the FBI is being drawn into question. This series subtly provides a backdrop for current political events and takes us back to a time when the integrity of the FBI was at deepening low. There’s no way the producers could have foreseen some of the parallels that could be drawn, which makes the series more genuine.
Normally I am not a fan of docudramas, but this one has the same polish and excellent writing/casting as FX’s The People vs. OJ Simpson. Yes, it is scripted, but it does a great job of keeping to the facts. As a history and true crime author, I had a benchmark coming into this series. I told my wife, “You can’t tell the story of what happened in Waco if you don’t tell the story in some way, about what happened with the Weaver’s at Ruby Ridge.” That standoff set the stage for Waco.
The first episode started with Ruby Ridge and immediately I was drawn in. I knew that the producers were going to try and tell the whole story of the tragic events that unfolded.
Koresh is not a crazed cult-leader. There are a lot of layers to this man. The series does an excellent job of drawing in the viewers to the life he was trying to establish for his church members. This is not Jim Jones, but a man that finds himself the target of the ATF because that agency was trying to use the Davidians as a PR event to rebuild their reputation after Ruby Ridge.
David Koresh does not come across as a cult leader, but a victim of sorts. His followers are not mindless drones in the series, but well-crafted characters and personalities all on their own.
Waco is captivating, compelling, and has outstanding performances. It pulls you in and holds you tight to your seat. It doesn’t stray from the truth, but attempts to put it into context…a rarity for Hollywood these days. If you are not watching it, I recommend you do (Paramount Networks – Wednesday’s at 10pm). We are just two episodes in and I am truly enjoying this series.
We’re through four episodes so far of the new season of the Killing Fields and so far Discovery has not failed to deliver.
This season was a big departure for the series. The shift went from Iberville Parish, Louisiana to Isle of Wight County, Virginia. Some of the same elements are there. A frigid cold case. A grizzled and seasoned investigator determined to see it solved. The “young buck” detective that is partnered with them. The seasoned officer sitting in his backyard with a drink at night is still there. It has the same gritty look and feel to the past two seasons – lots of drone shots, and plenty of twists and turns. Discovery has done a good job of keeping the elements of the series in place as it transitions to a new locale. Personally, I miss Rhodie talking about the “raggedy-ass” killers though.
The twists and turns are plentiful. What starts out as the investigation into the brutal murder of Carrie Singer morphs into the two murders that may be connected. We see some of the new technologies in DNA testing, such as M-Vac systems DNA collecting system, and DNA phenotyping (getting a facial reconstruction of a killer from their DNA), being brought into play.
I know some of this is scripted, but it certainly plays out as realistic. Often times investigators start down one trail, only to be seductively lured onto new paths as a result of their efforts. I haven’t bonded much with the key characters just yet – but we are only four episodes in…and frankly, it feels like a rollercoaster ride of twists and turns.
For me, this series is more personal. Two of the victims of the Colonial Parkway Murders (David Knobling and Robin Edwards) were found at the Ragged Island Wildlife Refuge in Isle of Wight County. My daughter and I wrote a book on these serial killings, A Special Kind of Evil. I have been there many times, taking that long, lonely, sometimes eerie, drive on the James River Bridge. It was great for me to see the former Sheriff, Charlie Phelps, in one episode. I interviewed him twice and it was great to associate a face to a voice.
Isle of Wight is a place of contradictions and contrasts. It is isolated, yet very close to numerous cities. Like any rural county, there is a mix of characters and backstories that are starting to emerge in the series. It has been a dumping ground for years for Newport News and other cities. It has a bit of hometown appeal, a dash of redneckiness, and a twist of strangeness that makes it compelling to watch.
If you are not watching Killing Fields – start. You can get caught up On-Demand. It is worth your time if you are a true crime fan. Even if you are not, it is a great view into an active investigation – filmed “real time.” Let’s hope that Discovery’s efforts brings about some convictions in the murders profiled.
I have to admit a fondness for Guy Fawkes and his fellow conspirators. Oppressed, they sought to change the course of history. There is a bit of a rebel in all of us and in some ways Fawkes and his fellow conspirator’s appeals to those feelings on their most base level. Of course, in reality, the suppressed Catholics became even larger targets of oppressions as a result of the infamous Gunpowder plot’s horrific failure.
I would say that this review of spoiler-free, but I can assure you, it is not. Series based on history cannot be spoiler free.
When I saw HBO was doing a series on this, starring Kit Harrington from Game of Thrones, I was pretty excited. Americans only know Guy Fawkes from the movie “V for Vendetta” so I thought that this was going to be a great docudrama that was both entertaining and educational.
It is a dark series, both story-wise and visually. There are a number of characters introduced that we never really get to know and invest ourselves in. As such, their fates do not mean much to us as viewers – which is a lost opportunity. That isn’t to say that this is a bad series – in fact is very captivating and stimulating, with a bit of a let-down at the end.
The story of English Catholics during King James reign is played out in dramatic fashion in the opening episode. The scenes of the crushing death of a Catholic resistor was disturbing and unfortunately historically accurate.
Guy Fawkes emerges in the second episode as a bit of a bad-ass. When push came to shove, the plan is hatched to blow up Parliament and the King. The second episode does a great job of building up for a confrontation and conflagration.
The third episode is a cascade on many levels. One, the bombing plan unravels. The explanation of the Spanish as the exposers of the assassination is far-fetched (and likely inaccurate) but adds to the intrigue of the story. Guy Fawkes, who was such a larger-than-life figure in the second episode is quickly subdued and the explosives diffused. Harrington’s character Robert Catesby, digs in for a fight to the finish, a battle he does not win. (Sidebar: I understand that Harrington is related to Catesby, which is incredibly cool.)
I had to research this period for my book on the cannibal clan of Sawney Bean, which certainly helped my personal enjoyment. I will say that the end of the series was disappointing. The characters you embrace are dead (not Game of Thrones style either) and you don’t know what happened after their demise. Even the contemporary impact of the Gunpowder plot is ignored. The viewer is left wanting more – even some closure. I anticipated the poem above to be read, or images of Guy Fawkes Night in modern times. We don’t get these.
Despite the depressing ending, which mirrored real life, the series has a grittiness and realistic feel about it that is entertaining and chilling. It is well worth the three hours of your time to watch.
I came into this with a lot of apprehension. I mean, this IS the History Channel. How they have covered true crime in the past has been fair to good, but they also back projects like Hunting for Hitler which was a bizarre waste of viewing time. What compelled me to watch was that fellow true crime author Ken Mains was involved. We write for the same publisher (Wild Blue Press) and I loved his book on cold cases, Unsolved No More. His involvement meant there might be hope for this series.
I was not disappointed.
Mains and retired LAPD homicide detective, Sal LaBarbera host the show and have come at Zodiac from a completely different angle than I expected. They are targeting those crimes that Zodiac claimed credit for beyond the ones he was confirmed to have been involved with. This is proving an awesome approach. It means we are getting perspectives and names of suspects not commonly tied to the Zodiac case. Some of these are downright creepy persons of interest that might very well have ties to the more well-known Zodiac cases.
Added to this is the use of the CARMEL supercomputer which is being used to attempt to break Zodiac’s previously unbroken codes. As an IT guy, I was intrigued by this new angle and approach. Yes it is geeky, but it is cool. When the computer began to write Zodiac inspired poetry – I have to admit, the creep factor went up to 9.6.
The combination of seasoned veteran investigators, a new perspective on Zodiac, and the use of a supercomputer has forged a new true crime show that is must-watch TV. The investigators are engaging, the pace is good, and they are going where the evidence takes them. I have to admit, I look forward to the new episode every week.
If you haven’t been following The Hunt for the Zodiac Killer, I suggest you drink in these first episodes and get up to speed. New perspectives on cold cases are always welcome additions to what we think we know about these infamous crimes.
Being a true crime author, I’m ashamed that I haven’t gotten around to reading the book that this series is based on yet. It is a matter of time and priority, juggling my own investigations on top of requests for reading.
I sat down to drink in Mindhunter on Netflix when I was recently sick, doing a rare binge-watch of the series. I thoroughly enjoyed it. This is the story of how the FBI got into the behavioral science of researching the patterns of serial killers. While that topic sounds potentially slow, they find ways of telling this story that grip and captivate the viewer.
This is the story of three characters on their journey into the dark, twisted minds of the murderers. One is an arrogant and defiant young agent who is willing to break to rules in a rather Machiavellian manner. Another is a more seasoned agent, more “by-the-book.” The other is a psychologist that is an outsider to the FBI, who understand the full potential of this kind of research. It is a good dynamic of characters working towards the same goal, but coming at it from very different angles and perspectives.
Opposing them is the FBI itself, the resistance of law enforcement agencies to this new way of thinking, and the serial killers they must confront and mentally dissect. It makes for good, solid, and entertaining TV.
It was fun to see the origins of words and phrases that I take for granted as an author such as “organized,” and “disorganized,” in relation to serial killers. The portrayal of the FBI as a big bureaucratic organization, fixed in its mindset and approach, seemed fairly accurate to my own limited experience.
Set in the 1970’s the sets and cars are spot on accurate. I only found one real flaw. In the first episode they show Agent Ford’s apartment as a tall building in Fredericksburg, Virginia. Sorry Netflix, you’d be hard pressed to find something over four stories tall there, even today.
Fair warning, the first episode was a tad slow for me, but after that it had moments that were pure mental terror to watch. This is the kind of show you have to commit to…and it is a commitment worth making.
My only critique is the whole storyline of Holden Ford and his girlfriend. It just feels forced to me. The sex scenes (approximately one an episode) often feel like they are just tossed in.
I cannot speak as to whether it is accurate to the book – but it doesn’t matter – it stands on its own.
I finished watching Manhunt: Unabomber a week or so after finishing The Keepers. I was tempted to compare and contrast the two, but I won’t. It’s like comparing apples and grapes.
I generally dislike shows that are scripted dramas of real events. Mostly because there are so many bad ones out there. But starting a few years ago with Fargo (the series) that began to change. When the OJ miniseries came out, it was exceptional. Manhunt: Unabomber belongs in that class of show – with high production qualities, good acting, and a great script.
This series is the story of Jim Fitzgerald of the FBI who creates a new form of criminal investigation called forensic linguistics which ultimately leads to the Unabomber’s (Ted Kaczynski) arrest. I like the fact that the focus was less on the criminal and the horrific crimes and more on the investigation that brought this bastard to justice.
Kaczynski is the perfect foil for the mind of Fitzgerald in this series. Yes, we all know that he ends up in jail, but there is a genius there, a brilliance that requires an equal in the form of the FBI agent.
Fitz (as he is called) sacrifices a lot to catch his prey – his marriage, his family, friends, colleagues, etc. In the end, despite the victory, you almost feel that is hollow for the character. Others steal his limelight and while we see justice prevail, the cost cuts like shrapnel from one of the killer’s devices. The struggles that Fitz goes through against the rigid bureaucracy of the FBI rings true to me to this day…trust me.
The writing is brilliant as is the casting. What I like the most is the incredible attention to details. Ted’s cabin is almost a character all by itself, silent, yet a part of his own twisted personality.
The producers were outstanding. They did not turn this into the gore-fest that it could have been, but gave it purpose and focus. I hope other producers that do recreations look to this as one of those gold-standards…right up there with Fargo.
If you didn’t watch this series, get it via On-Demand or from your provider. It is chilling, breathtaking, and educational.
As an author/historian, I tend to view Game of Thrones with a different lens. After all, Time Magazine listed one of my books as good source material on the Wildlings. http://time.com/4347517/game-of-thrones-history-books/ . That doesn’t really mean much, but I felt the plug was well-earned.
There are things we all want to see in this series, having invested 60+ hours into it. As an author, there are twists I would put in. I doubt any of mine are actually in the coming two seasons, but this helps kill the time while I wait.
Also, the authors have given us hints already, buried in previous seasons. So, here’s my list of things I would like to see – some predictions, some merely wish list items:
Things that should happen:
Daenerys Targaryen lands in Westros. Her family’s hereditary home is Dragonestone, where Stannis Baratheon led his attempt at the throne. This makes sense for her to go there first. It is the kind of thing that Tyrion would recommend. She still has to contend with a rogue Greyjoy uncle, but after that, the squeeze play on the Lannisters can begin.
Jon Snow and Daenerys meet. You may be wondering why would Jon waste time meeting her? Simple. The writers put in the previous seasons that Dragonestone is a source of dragon-glass, (obsidian) which kills the army of the dead. Jon’s going to need a source of that stuff if he hoped to hold out. Don’t count on their first meeting to be all hugs and kisses. The writers are good, they won’t make this a smooth first meeting but one where the characters gain respect for each other. Jon’s focus is on the army of the dead, Dany’s out to rid the world of pesky Lannisters. I imagine Jon being sent north to hold the line while Daenerys takes care of cleaning up the rest of Westros. No wedding in season seven.
The return of Gendry. An heir to House Baratheon, he disappeared seasons ago. I can see him playing some sort of role once Dany returns. The writers create characters to bring them back.
The return of Jorah Mormont. As a writer, I would have him arrive with reinforcements at the hour of Daenerys’s greatest need, right before she is about to lose a battle. I don’t want him to die in the attempt, but given the penchant for the writer’s to kill him – I can see that happening.
The return of Daario Naharis. Do you really think that mercenary will remain across the Narrow Sea? I don’t. I want him and the Second Sons to come and open a can of whoop-ass in Westros.
Cersei goes mad. I will grant you, it’s not a far trip for her. She is going to continue her spiral into madness I think. She will slaughter thousands to hold onto the power she had seized. I almost pity Jamie – well, almost.
Arya will meet up with Melisandre again. One thing about GoT is that it is a buddy show. The brilliant writers combine characters and hilarity (and death) ensues. Arya and Melisandre met and the Red Witch said, “We will meet again.” Ayra is riding north, Melisandre is riding south. They are bound to connect and I don’t think it will result in death.
Sam learns the secrets of making Valyrian steel. Look, I could care less about him and Gilly, but Sam’s research has helped out Jon in the past, and that is destined to continue (otherwise why follow his character at all). Jon has learned that Valyrian steel unleashes a shitstorm of pain on white walkers. Sam must learn this and possibly about the Horn of Winter. What is the Horn? Remember when Sam found the dragon glass at the Fist of the First Men. Go back to that – there was a horn found as well. It has to be the Horn of Winter. In the books, the Horn of Winter awoke the giants and had the power to shatter the wall. Sam innocently left it at Castle Black, the worst possible place for something that powerful.
The Brothers Without Banners will play a role in fighting the white walkers.
More Lyanna Mormont. She has more balls than most of the male characters, especially Theon. Shame on the writers if we don’t see her kicking some ass in the remaining seasons. She’s my favorite character of them all.
Pod and Bronn reunite with Tyrion. We all want to see this. It would be heartbreaking if they kill Bronn in the war. He’s my favorite mercenary.
Jamie and Tyrion. Talk about an uncomfortable family reunion.
Sam and Jon. It’s going to happen.
Cersei and the Queen of Thornes. You cannot get too much of Diana Rigg. Her scenes with Tyrion were priceless too, so perhaps we will get a good dose of that as well.
Melisandre and the Brothers Without Banners. Enough said here.
Brienne of Tarth and Tormund. Some of the best acting in Game of Thrones was the facial expressions between the wildling and the lady knight. We want more of this.
Brienne of Tarth and Jamie Lannister. The last they saw of each other was when Brienne left Riverrun and Jamie let her go. We need a counterpart to that scene, something to balance it out. Perhaps she will repay the favor in an upcoming battle?
Shagga, son of Dolf, is the leader of the Stone Crows, of the Hill Tribes that fought for Tyrion in Season One and Tyrion. They introduced this faction with Tyrion and I bet our favorite dwarf enlists their aid for Daenerys.
Arya and the Hound. She took the Hound off of her list (not an easy thing to do mind you). Both characters have changed since they last met. It would be a shame if we didn’t see them together again. Perhaps Arya will join the Brothers…?
Arya’s Stark. Let’s face it, this is one damaged character. She’s an assassin. I can’t picture her fitting in with the surviving family members because, well, she’s a murderess. I think her fate will be determined by Jaqen H’ghar. The Faceless God will take his toll here I believe.
Littlefinger. Let’s face it, Littlefinger set all of this crap in motion. He framed Tyron Lannister for attempting to kill Bran Stark, driving the two houses to war. Varys summed him up best, “He would burn the world to rule the ashes.” You would expect Sansa to be there at his downfall. I am a writer. I picture young Robin Arryn pushing Littlefinger through the Moon Door when he learns that he was responsible for the death of his mother. That would be awesome and fitting.
Jamie Lannister. The Kingslayer will have to die. Two options as a writer here. One, Tyrion must order it (hard to do, his brother saved him). The other, is at the hand of Brienne of Tarth. Those two have a love thing going. It’s very Shakespearian to have her deliver his death with the sword he gave her. (see my Cersei entry below for an alternate end to Jamie.)
Sansa Stark. Who cares? She’s starting to get interesting, but seriously, I just don’t like her. I could see her surviving everything that goes down. If Jon does marry Daenerys, which we’d all eventually like, she could take the helm at Winterfell as the head of House Stark.
Cersei Lannister. I picture the Mountain killing Cersei for some dark and forbidding reason. We all anticipate that the Mountain will face his downfall at the hands of the Hound. Too predictable. There is a real twist of fate there. We all want Tyrion to be the one to determine his sister’s fate, but I doubt we will get something that simple. My alternate ending: The ultimate irony would be that Jamie has to kill her, adding Queenslayer to his resume’. Frankly, Jamie would have to kill himself afterwards.
Tyrion Lannister. The authors have already told you the perfect end-cap for him. He wanted to retire to his own vineyards and pictures himself surrounded by his friends. Wouldn’t that be an awesome way to end the series? Ten years later…we see him with Grey Worm, Dany, and the other survivors, drinking wine with their old friend. Perfect ending.
Bran Stark. Bran’s role I think is bigger than what we know or understand. I think he could even be the old man in the tree that he meets later. A popular theory is that he is actually Bran the Builder – travelling back in time to build the wall. I think the key to Bran is that he can travel in time and can influence it. He may end up getting lost in time as well. Ultimately I cannot help but wonder if Bran is the Lord of Light?
Davos Seaworth. I see him as being an emissary to the Brothers Without Banners to enlist their aide.
Daenerys Targaryen. Remember when those wizards captured her dragons back in Season Two? Remember how she wandered in that tower from scene to scene. She found the Iron Throne in a destroyed throne room, snow falling, empty and alone. The writers are good and I believe that scene was deliberate. I think this is exactly how she will find the Iron Throne after her dragons unleash hell on the city.
I am a junkie for good true crime and TV has let me down a lot this year. Part of that is being an author of true crime books, but the majority is me being a fan of the genre. After the OJ series on FX, I was hopeful to see more good prime-time true crime. There was some, but most of the series came across as cheap, exploitative, or designed to sway public opinion (i.e. the Jon Benet series on A&E).
Discovery Channel, however, does not fail with the second season of Killing Fields. Our boys are still working the case of Eugenie Boisfontaine but this season they shifted to a local man, Tommy Francise, who is implicated in not one murder but two.
Few series out there show you how investigations work as well as Killing Fields. The dogged pursuit, the following of where the evidence takes investigators, and the cooperation with prosecutors. This is a great series that takes you through small-town America, warts and all.
Tommy Francise is a bad apple all around. Frankly I was stunned he wasn’t arrested for the murder of at least one of these men – he confessed the murder to one of the officers, Rodie. I won’t ruin this season for you, but it ends with a big event, one you find yourself rooting and cheering through.
Tips for Eugenie Boisfontaine are still coming in too. I personally hope our two officers in the series get an arrest soon on that case.
There are two other things that make this series a winner. One is the filming. You get lots of neat angles, drone-shots, etc., that just put you there in Louisiana with the investigators. The second thing is the dialogue between officers Aubrey St. Angelo and Rodie Sanchez. These two are opposite sides of the same coin. They are funny and filled with steely determination.
The series is short and available on Discovery Channel or On-Demand. Watch it – soak it in. This is hope for everyone out there who wants to see cold cases resolve.
This HBO documentary is compelling, chilling, disturbing and frightening all at the same time. We’ve probably all heard about the case – two young girls who attacked and nearly killed a friend of theirs because of a fictitious character on the internet called Slenderman.
As a true crime writer, I knew that the media only marginally was telling the story…and I was right. This documentary is not just about the crime, it is about how some urban legend takes becomes folklore that is trusted and believed. I was familiar with this phenomena, having written a book on the Scottish cannibal, Sawney Bean. Slenderman doesn’t exist, but thanks to the internet and Photoshop, this mythical strange tall kidnapper of children has developed a near cult-like following.
This is a story of two quite normal young girls that get caught up in the stories about the Slenderman and believe they must kill their friend to prove themselves worthy of him. Separately, they are seemingly normal kids. Together, they became a single killer. There are elements here that harken back to Capote’s In Cold Blood.
You may be quick to blame the parents for letting them on the web sites, but when you watch the show you come to realize that these were not negligent parents. They simply had no idea of the power of images and words might have over their daughters.
The filming of this documentary is outstanding. If you watch Killing Fields on Discovery, you will get the same vibe here – lots of drone shots and angles of neighborhoods that cast a sinister shadow and add to the ambiance. The use of the interrogation footage of the two would-be murderers is creepy all on its own. One girl was more concerned about the distance she had walked before her capture rather than what she had done to her friend. The victim had been stabbed 19 times. It’s gut wrenching and you can’t shut it off because it is so well done.
This documentary is not the complete story – the victim and her family did not participate in the filming – for obvious reasons. It is complete enough though….so much that you will never let your kids onto the internet again. That cannot be a bad thing. Some of the footage is so disturbing and captivating that you come through the viewing emotionally wrung out.
While the Slenderman is digital folklore, his impact in our reality is quite tangible…and chilling. I give this a solid five of five stars. Kudos HBO!